ELIS vs. QBTZ
ELIS (Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares) and QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ELIS charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QBTZ.
Performance
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ELIS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTZ
- 1D
- 16.41%
- 1M
- -74.19%
- YTD
- -86.63%
- 6M
- -91.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ELIS Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares | 11.37% | -21.46% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -86.63% | -50.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELIS and QBTZ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares (ELIS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELIS | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.42 | — |
Drawdowns
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELIS | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -96.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -95.35% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -55.63% | — |
Volatility
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELIS | QBTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 235.15% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 235.15% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 235.15% | — |
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELIS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than QBTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELIS vs. QBTZ - Dividend Comparison
ELIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, while QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELIS Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares | 5.26% | 5.86% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELIS and QBTZ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELIS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELIS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.
ELIS has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Defiance ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ELIS and 1.29% for QBTZ.
Find the right allocation for ELIS and QBTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer