ELFY vs. VOLT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ELFY (ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ELFY is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Ladenburg Thalmann Electrification Infrastructure Index, while VOLT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tema. ELFY is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, ELFY returned 23.88% vs 40.13% for VOLT. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ELFY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

ELFY vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELFY achieves a 18.04% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 30.27% return.

ELFY

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: 9.13%
• YTD: 18.04%
• 1Y: 23.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 42.33%

VOLT

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -3.80%
• 6M: 15.87%
• YTD: 30.27%
• 1Y: 40.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF	$1.73M	$2.33M	$2.21M
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	$11.23M	$11.22M	$15.49M

ELFY vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF	18.04%	34.72%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	30.27%	37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ELFY and VOLT is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025	0.88

The correlation between ELFY and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ELFY vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ELFY	VOLT
Utilities	40.0%	28.2%
Industrials	26.0%	50.4%
Energy	16.0%	4.7%
Technology	12.8%	14.1%
Basic Materials	4.4%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	2.6%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ELFY vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ELFY

ELFY Risk / Return Rank: 46
ELFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ELFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ELFY Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ELFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
ELFY Martin Ratio Rank: 53

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ELFY vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELFY	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.65	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	2.20	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	2.34	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	8.84	-2.44

ELFY vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELFY Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELFY and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ELFY vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELFY drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFY and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELFY	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.61%	-23.40%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.61%	-17.22%	+3.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.16%	-10.39%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-5.35%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	4.55%	-0.81%

Volatility

ELFY vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) is 6.75%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that ELFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELFY	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	9.72%	-2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.01%	21.11%	-4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.80%	24.49%	-3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.06%	25.46%	-5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.06%	25.46%	-5.40%

ELFY vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELFY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELFY vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

ELFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than VOLT's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF	1.04%	0.76%	0.00%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.35%	0.46%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELFY and VOLT in my portfolio?

ELFY and VOLT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELFY or VOLT?

VOLT has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to ELFY (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELFY dropped -13.61% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

Which ETF is better, ELFY or VOLT?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 40.13% vs 23.88% for ELFY. On fees, ELFY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ELFY has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ELFY or VOLT?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 40.13% return vs 23.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ELFY or VOLT?

ELFY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ELFY or VOLT?

ELFY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.35% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between ELFY and VOLT?

ELFY is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while VOLT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ELFY and 0.75% for VOLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.