ELFY vs. BKGI
ELFY (ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. ELFY is passively managed, while BKGI is actively managed. Over the past year, ELFY returned 23.88% vs 19.81% for BKGI. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ELFY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.
Performance
ELFY vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELFY achieves a 18.04% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 13.98% return.
ELFY
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 42.33%
BKGI
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.35M | $14.92M | $11.64M | |
| $1.73M | $2.33M | $2.21M |
ELFY vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 18.04% | 34.72% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 13.98% | 25.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELFY and BKGI is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.46 |
ELFY vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ELFY
BKGI
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
ELFY
BKGI
Industrials
ELFY
BKGI
Energy
ELFY
BKGI
Technology
ELFY
BKGI
-
Basic Materials
ELFY
BKGI
-
Consumer Cyclical
ELFY
BKGI
-
Financial Services
ELFY
BKGI
-
Communication Services
ELFY
-
BKGI
Consumer Defensive
ELFY
-
BKGI
-
Healthcare
ELFY
-
BKGI
-
Real Estate
ELFY
-
BKGI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELFY vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank
ELFY
BKGI
ELFY vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELFY | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.23 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 9.62 | -3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELFY vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELFY drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum BKGI drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFY and BKGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELFY | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -14.79% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -6.16% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.16% | -2.00% | -7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -2.54% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 2.06% | +1.68% |
Volatility
ELFY vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 2.77%. This indicates that ELFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELFY | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 2.77% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 9.54% | +7.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.80% | 11.60% | +9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 13.94% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 13.94% | +6.12% |
ELFY vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELFY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELFY vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison
ELFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than BKGI's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.90% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 1.04% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELFY and BKGI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELFY has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to BKGI (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELFY dropped -13.61% vs BKGI's -14.79%.
On 1-year performance, ELFY leads with 23.88% vs 19.81% for BKGI. On fees, ELFY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ELFY has performed better with a 23.88% return vs 19.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ELFY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 1.04% for ELFY.
They also come from different issuers: ALPS and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ELFY and 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELFY and BKGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer