ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ELFC.DE (Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF) and XECT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C) are both Europe Equities funds - ELFC.DE tracks the EURO iSTOXX® ex Financials High Dividend 50 while XECT.DE tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ELFC.DE returned 12.09%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for XECT.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELFC.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XECT.DE.

Performance

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELFC.DE achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than XECT.DE's 6.91% return.

ELFC.DE

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 12.29%
• 1Y: 20.13%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

XECT.DE

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 6M: 9.38%
• 1Y: 14.52%
• 3Y*: 12.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ELFC.DE Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF	12.62%	17.73%	-0.16%	5.93%
XECT.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C	6.91%	16.87%	7.18%	7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ELFC.DE and XECT.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023	0.67

The correlation between ELFC.DE and XECT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELFC.DE

ELFC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ELFC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ELFC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ELFC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ELFC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 51

XECT.DE

XECT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 30
XECT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
XECT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XECT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XECT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XECT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ELFC.DE	XECT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.07	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	1.55	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.20	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.29	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	4.73	+3.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the XECT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELFC.DE and XECT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ELFC.DE	XECT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.07	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.91	-0.36

Drawdowns

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELFC.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than XECT.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFC.DE and XECT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELFC.DE	XECT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.68%	-16.63%	-21.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.71%	-11.20%	+4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.02%	-16.63%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-1.91%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.70%	-2.28%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	3.06%	-0.67%

Volatility

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) is 2.62%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that ELFC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XECT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELFC.DE	XECT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	4.45%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.07%	11.31%	-3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.12%	13.52%	-2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.76%	13.05%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.40%	13.05%	+3.35%

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELFC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XECT.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELFC.DE vs. XECT.DE - Dividend Comparison

ELFC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, while XECT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ELFC.DE Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF	4.08%	4.45%	4.66%	4.66%	4.91%	3.85%	2.83%	3.64%	4.20%	3.53%	3.57%
XECT.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELFC.DE and XECT.DE in my portfolio?

ELFC.DE and XECT.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ELFC.DE or XECT.DE?

On fees, XECT.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ELFC.DE or XECT.DE?

XECT.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ELFC.DE.

What is the main difference between ELFC.DE and XECT.DE?

ELFC.DE tracks EURO iSTOXX® ex Financials High Dividend 50, while XECT.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Deka and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ELFC.DE and 0.12% for XECT.DE.