PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELFC.DE achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ELFC.DE has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 8.86%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.


ELFC.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
12.62%
6M
11.95%
1Y
20.69%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
8.86%

CEMS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
2.64%
YTD
13.72%
6M
16.98%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELFC.DE
Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF
12.62%17.73%-0.16%15.69%1.54%21.96%-7.15%19.94%-4.03%6.11%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
13.72%35.97%9.93%13.90%-4.54%26.62%-8.86%23.48%-14.04%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ELFC.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.82

The correlation between ELFC.DE and CEMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELFC.DE
ELFC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELFC.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.29

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

12.37

-3.95

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELFC.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELFC.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.37

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.94

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.61

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELFC.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFC.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFC.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-40.20%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-9.99%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-17.57%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-19.55%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

-40.20%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.26%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-7.49%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.66%

-0.27%

Volatility

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) is 2.62%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that ELFC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFC.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.65%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

11.17%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

13.87%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

15.23%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

17.43%

-1.03%

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELFC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELFC.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

ELFC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, while CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ELFC.DE
Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF
4.08%4.45%4.66%4.66%4.91%3.85%2.83%3.64%4.20%3.53%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELFC.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ELFC.DE.

ELFC.DE tracks EURO iSTOXX® ex Financials High Dividend 50, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Deka and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ELFC.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELFC.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer