PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ELFB.DE having a 9.36% return and PR1Z.DE slightly lower at 9.20%.


ELFB.DE

1D
0.83%
1M
4.04%
YTD
9.36%
6M
11.83%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
12.75%

PR1Z.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
2.15%
YTD
9.20%
6M
10.94%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ELFB.DE
Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF
9.36%34.04%20.63%31.85%-15.46%31.62%-2.71%20.84%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
9.20%24.78%9.45%19.43%-12.46%27.38%-4.61%22.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ELFB.DE and PR1Z.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019

0.89

The correlation between ELFB.DE and PR1Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELFB.DE
ELFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ELFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1Z.DE
PR1Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELFB.DEPR1Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.84

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

6.79

+0.09

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELFB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELFB.DE and PR1Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELFB.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.66

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.65

-0.09

Drawdowns

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.72%, which is greater than PR1Z.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFB.DE and PR1Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFB.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.72%

-39.52%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-10.29%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-15.66%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.56%

-24.19%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.41%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-5.61%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.79%

+0.74%

Volatility

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) at 4.59%. This indicates that ELFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFB.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

4.59%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

11.98%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.91%

14.52%

+4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

16.26%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

18.63%

+2.36%

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELFB.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1Z.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELFB.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

ELFB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than PR1Z.DE's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ELFB.DE
Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF
2.02%2.18%2.63%2.73%3.03%1.78%1.12%3.22%3.60%2.56%2.77%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.31%2.53%2.77%2.80%3.09%1.83%2.11%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ELFB.DE and PR1Z.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ELFB.DE.

ELFB.DE tracks Solactive Eurozone Sustainability, while PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ELFB.DE and 0.05% for PR1Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELFB.DE and PR1Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer