PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELFB.DE achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly higher than ASWA.DE's -10.58% return.


ELFB.DE

1D
0.83%
1M
4.04%
YTD
9.36%
6M
11.83%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
12.75%

ASWA.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.85%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ELFB.DE
Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF
9.36%34.04%20.63%7.45%
ASWA.DE
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc
-10.58%26.07%-11.37%-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ELFB.DE and ASWA.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.62

The correlation between ELFB.DE and ASWA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELFB.DE
ELFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ELFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ASWA.DE
ASWA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELFB.DEASWA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

0.01

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

0.03

+6.85

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELFB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELFB.DE and ASWA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELFB.DEASWA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.01

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

-0.04

+0.59

Drawdowns

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.72%, which is greater than ASWA.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELFB.DE and ASWA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFB.DEASWA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.72%

-30.36%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-30.36%

+17.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-23.85%

+23.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-8.15%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

10.54%

-7.01%

Volatility

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) is 5.34%, while HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that ELFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFB.DEASWA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

7.52%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

37.06%

-21.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.91%

33.68%

-14.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

24.72%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

24.72%

-3.73%

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELFB.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ASWA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELFB.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Dividend Comparison

ELFB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while ASWA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ASWA.DE
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ELFB.DE
Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF
2.02%2.18%2.63%2.73%3.03%1.78%1.12%3.22%3.60%2.56%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELFB.DE and ASWA.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ELFB.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

ELFB.DE tracks Solactive Eurozone Sustainability, while ASWA.DE tracks SGI European Green Deal ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: Deka and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ELFB.DE and 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELFB.DE and ASWA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer