PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF1.DE achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZZ.DE's 7.20% return.


ELF1.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
5.14%
YTD
6.68%
6M
10.35%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
-1.03%
10Y*
4.24%

H4ZZ.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
4.70%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.61%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ELF1.DE
Deka MDAX UCITS ETF
6.68%19.01%-5.82%7.32%-2.60%
H4ZZ.DE
HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.20%22.35%10.99%22.53%9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ELF1.DE and H4ZZ.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.80

The correlation between ELF1.DE and H4ZZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELF1.DE
ELF1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ELF1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZZ.DE
H4ZZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELF1.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.43

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

4.86

-3.92

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF1.DE and H4ZZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELF1.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.98

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.18

-0.89

Drawdowns

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF1.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF1.DE and H4ZZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELF1.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-16.46%

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-10.94%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-16.46%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.79%

-0.53%

-11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-2.68%

-9.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

3.23%

+2.07%

Volatility

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE) have volatilities of 5.03% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELF1.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.93%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

12.97%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

15.97%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

15.85%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

15.85%

+2.48%

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELF1.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELF1.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELF1.DE nor H4ZZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELF1.DE
Deka MDAX UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.48%0.46%0.44%0.41%
H4ZZ.DE
HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELF1.DE and H4ZZ.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ELF1.DE.

ELF1.DE tracks MDAX®, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: Deka and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ELF1.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELF1.DE and H4ZZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer