ELEF.TO vs. GLE
ELEF.TO (Silver Elephant Mining Corp.) and GLE (Global Engine Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. ELEF.TO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while GLE operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past year, ELEF.TO returned -35.00% vs -82.67% for GLE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ELEF.TO is traded in CAD, while GLE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELEF.TO achieves a -60.61% return, which is significantly lower than GLE's 30.24% return.
ELEF.TO
- 1D
- -7.14%
- 1M
- -27.78%
- YTD
- -60.61%
- 6M
- -59.38%
- 1Y
- -35.00%
- 3Y*
- -29.44%
- 5Y*
- -38.01%
- 10Y*
- -17.59%
GLE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 30.39%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- -82.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ELEF.TO Silver Elephant Mining Corp. | -60.61% | 73.68% | -61.62% |
GLE Global Engine Group Holding Ltd | 30.24% | -80.70% | -56.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELEF.TO and GLE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
ELEF.TO:
CA$0.00
GLE:
$46.01M
ELEF.TO:
-CA$123.25K
GLE:
$6.13M
ELEF.TO:
CA$23.22M
GLE:
$1.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELEF.TO vs. GLE — Risk / Return Rank
ELEF.TO
GLE
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silver Elephant Mining Corp. (ELEF.TO) and Global Engine Group Holding Ltd (GLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELEF.TO | GLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.95 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.89 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | -1.04 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELEF.TO | GLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | -0.52 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | -0.49 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than GLE's maximum drawdown of -95.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELEF.TO and GLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELEF.TO | GLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.83% | -95.07% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.67% | -92.71% | +26.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -91.36% | -8.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -70.13% | -11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.01% | 79.51% | -44.50% |
Volatility
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Silver Elephant Mining Corp. (ELEF.TO) is 25.31%, while Global Engine Group Holding Ltd (GLE) has a volatility of 66.14%. This indicates that ELEF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELEF.TO | GLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.31% | 66.14% | -40.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.69% | 92.20% | -34.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.62% | 160.79% | -59.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.10% | 148.31% | -40.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.13% | 148.31% | -38.18% |
Dividends
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ELEF.TO nor GLE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ELEF.TO vs. GLE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silver Elephant Mining Corp. and Global Engine Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ELEF.TO and GLE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ELEF.TO and GLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer