ELCV vs. CSTK
ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) and CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ELCV returned 30.91% vs 26.71% for CSTK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELCV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSTK.
Performance
ELCV vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELCV achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than CSTK's 11.29% return.
ELCV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSTK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELCV vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 21.38% | 11.50% |
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 11.29% | 18.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELCV and CSTK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ELCV and CSTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELCV vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank
ELCV
CSTK
ELCV vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELCV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.15 | 3.02 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.81 | 11.85 | +9.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELCV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.38 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 2.54 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
ELCV vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELCV drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELCV and CSTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELCV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -8.87% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.05% | -8.87% | +3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -1.28% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 2.26% | -0.83% |
Volatility
ELCV vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison
Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) at 2.68%. This indicates that ELCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELCV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 2.68% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 8.45% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 11.28% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 11.60% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 11.60% | +3.78% |
ELCV vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELCV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELCV vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison
ELCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, which matches CSTK's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 1.77% | 1.44% | 0.00% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 1.76% | 2.34% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELCV and CSTK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELCV has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to CSTK (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELCV dropped -18.38% vs CSTK's -8.87%.
On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 30.91% vs 26.71% for CSTK. On fees, CSTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSTK has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 30.91% return vs 26.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV and CSTK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.76%.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ELCV and 0.35% for CSTK.
ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELCV and CSTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer