ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

ELCR.DE (Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ELCR.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Future Mobility ESG Filtered Index, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ELCR.DE returned 7.10%/yr vs 16.57%/yr for LYMS.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELCR.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.

Performance

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc) (ELCR.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELCR.DE achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 19.72% return.

ELCR.DE

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 15.07%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 1Y: 38.26%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: —

LYMS.DE

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -1.60%
• 6M: 20.94%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 1Y: 33.82%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: 16.57%
• 10Y*: 21.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ELCR.DE Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc)	15.74%	15.42%	20.30%	11.10%	-32.41%	42.04%	63.97%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	19.72%	7.15%	33.72%	51.52%	-29.87%	39.57%	31.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2020	0.72

The correlation between ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELCR.DE

ELCR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 62
ELCR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ELCR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ELCR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ELCR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ELCR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

LYMS.DE

LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc) (ELCR.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELCR.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.01	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.72	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	3.36	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	9.79	-1.42

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELCR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELCR.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELCR.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.74%	-50.00%	+10.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-10.02%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.51%	-26.74%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.74%	-31.11%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-2.12%	-2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.22%	-8.68%	-8.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.56%	3.44%	+1.12%

Volatility

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc) (ELCR.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 6.60%. This indicates that ELCR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELCR.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	6.60%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.36%	12.31%	+5.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.57%	16.81%	+5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.19%	20.05%	+5.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.55%	19.74%	+5.81%

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELCR.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELCR.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELCR.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ELCR.DE Amundi MSCI Smart Mobility UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.65%	0.69%	0.76%	1.09%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE in my portfolio?

ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ELCR.DE or LYMS.DE?

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ELCR.DE or LYMS.DE?

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ELCR.DE.

What is the main difference between ELCR.DE and LYMS.DE?

ELCR.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. ELCR.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Future Mobility ESG Filtered Index, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ELCR.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.