PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF (EL4S.DE) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL4S.DE achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than 10AL.DE's 0.10% return.


EL4S.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.17%
1Y
0.70%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
-0.20%

10AL.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.14%
1Y
0.27%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EL4S.DE
Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.11%1.65%2.75%2.51%-4.56%-0.97%-0.79%-0.83%-0.46%
10AL.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.10%0.67%1.54%6.66%-17.93%-3.35%4.91%7.30%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4S.DE and 10AL.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.63

The correlation between EL4S.DE and 10AL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4S.DE
EL4S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EL4S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

10AL.DE
10AL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
10AL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
10AL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF (EL4S.DE) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL4S.DE10AL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.00

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

-0.03

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

-0.07

+1.93

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4S.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the 10AL.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4S.DE and 10AL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL4S.DE10AL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

-0.02

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.35

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

-0.05

-0.26

Drawdowns

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4S.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum 10AL.DE drawdown of -22.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4S.DE and 10AL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4S.DE10AL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-22.08%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-3.42%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-4.05%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.86%

-21.09%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-13.80%

+7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-8.93%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

1.34%

-1.02%

Volatility

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF (EL4S.DE) is 0.44%, while Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AL.DE) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that EL4S.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 10AL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4S.DE10AL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

1.70%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

3.57%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10%

4.28%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.46%

6.19%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.12%

5.51%

-4.39%

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL4S.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 10AL.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL4S.DE vs. 10AL.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4S.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than 10AL.DE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
10AL.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan EMU Government Investment Grade UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.66%2.66%2.02%1.85%2.21%1.81%1.89%2.10%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EL4S.DE
Deka Deutsche Boerse EUROGOV Germany 1-3 UCITS ETF
1.48%1.20%0.83%0.60%0.88%0.94%0.78%1.06%0.99%1.63%1.46%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


EL4S.DE and 10AL.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 10AL.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

10AL.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EL4S.DE.

EL4S.DE tracks Deutsche Börse EUROGOV® Germany 1-3, while 10AL.DE tracks JP Morgan EMU Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EL4S.DE and 0.14% for 10AL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4S.DE and 10AL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer