PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 7-10 UCITS ETF (EL4P.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SECA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL4P.DE achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than SECA.DE's 0.13% return.


EL4P.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.17%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-2.34%
10Y*
-0.11%

SECA.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.13%
1Y
0.29%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-2.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EL4P.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 7-10 UCITS ETF
0.16%1.64%1.06%8.67%-20.09%-3.04%0.94%
SECA.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.13%0.69%1.43%6.89%-18.10%-3.27%1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4P.DE and SECA.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2020

0.95

The correlation between EL4P.DE and SECA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4P.DE
EL4P.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EL4P.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4P.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4P.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4P.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4P.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SECA.DE
SECA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SECA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SECA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 7-10 UCITS ETF (EL4P.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SECA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL4P.DESECA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.00

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

-0.01

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

-0.02

+0.23

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4P.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the SECA.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4P.DE and SECA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL4P.DESECA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

-0.00

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.34

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.37

+0.81

Drawdowns

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4P.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SECA.DE drawdown of -22.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4P.DE and SECA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4P.DESECA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-22.52%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-3.48%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.65%

-4.05%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.13%

-21.23%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.76%

-14.23%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-13.15%

+7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.37%

+0.16%

Volatility

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 7-10 UCITS ETF (EL4P.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SECA.DE) at 1.71%. This indicates that EL4P.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SECA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4P.DESECA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.71%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

3.61%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

4.38%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

6.36%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

6.12%

-0.06%

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL4P.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SECA.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL4P.DE vs. SECA.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4P.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while SECA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL4P.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 7-10 UCITS ETF
3.64%2.66%1.83%1.37%0.39%0.62%0.83%1.08%0.64%1.41%1.80%2.32%
SECA.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EL4P.DE and SECA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SECA.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SECA.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EL4P.DE.

EL4P.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Sovereigns Diversified 7-10, while SECA.DE tracks FTSE Advanced Climate Risk-Adjusted European Monetary Union Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: Deka and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EL4P.DE and 0.09% for SECA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4P.DE and SECA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer