PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 3-5 UCITS ETF (EL4M.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL4M.DE achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than XZEB.DE's 0.20% return.


EL4M.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.06%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
0.69%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
-0.03%

XZEB.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.18%
1Y
-0.32%
3Y*
1.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EL4M.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 3-5 UCITS ETF
-0.10%2.42%2.21%5.36%-5.43%
XZEB.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.20%-0.59%0.01%5.77%-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022

0.90

The correlation between EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4M.DE
EL4M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EL4M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XZEB.DE
XZEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 3-5 UCITS ETF (EL4M.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL4M.DEXZEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.97

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

-0.24

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

-0.53

+0.93

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4M.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL4M.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

-0.17

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.11

+0.58

Drawdowns

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4M.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.53%, roughly equal to the maximum XZEB.DE drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4M.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-13.98%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-2.97%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.63%

-4.45%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-7.28%

+3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-8.40%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.33%

-0.38%

Volatility

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 3-5 UCITS ETF (EL4M.DE) is 1.19%, while Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that EL4M.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4M.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.57%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

3.45%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

4.14%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.04%

6.32%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

6.32%

-3.19%

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL4M.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4M.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while XZEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL4M.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 3-5 UCITS ETF
2.17%2.76%1.93%1.89%0.55%0.79%1.06%1.41%1.08%2.12%1.66%1.83%
XZEB.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

EL4M.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Sovereigns Diversified 3-5, while XZEB.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4M.DE and XZEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer