PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 1-10 UCITS ETF (EL4K.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL4K.DE achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than XGEZ.DE's 1.60% return.


EL4K.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.81%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.24%
1Y
1.52%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
-0.21%

XGEZ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.74%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EL4K.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 1-10 UCITS ETF
1.10%1.88%1.40%7.39%-0.92%
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
1.60%-2.16%-0.51%8.88%-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4K.DE and XGEZ.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2022

0.94

The correlation between EL4K.DE and XGEZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4K.DE
EL4K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EL4K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XGEZ.DE
XGEZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGEZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 1-10 UCITS ETF (EL4K.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EL4K.DEXGEZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.01

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

0.06

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

0.12

+1.06

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4K.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the XGEZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4K.DE and XGEZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4K.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, which is greater than XGEZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4K.DE and XGEZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4K.DEXGEZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-13.63%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.38%

-4.70%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

-7.88%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-3.99%

-6.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-5.39%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

2.11%

-0.83%

Volatility

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 1-10 UCITS ETF (EL4K.DE) is 0.96%, while Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF (XGEZ.DE) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that EL4K.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGEZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4K.DEXGEZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.75%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

5.23%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

6.42%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

9.92%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

9.92%

-4.80%

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL4K.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XGEZ.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL4K.DE vs. XGEZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4K.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than XGEZ.DE's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL4K.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Sovereign Diversified 1-10 UCITS ETF
2.49%1.58%1.25%1.24%0.56%0.60%0.67%0.89%0.81%1.90%1.92%2.45%
XGEZ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Green Bond UCITS ETF
2.06%1.99%2.07%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EL4K.DE and XGEZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EL4K.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EL4K.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XGEZ.DE.

EL4K.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Sovereigns Diversified 1-10, while XGEZ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone Sovereigns Green Bonds Capped. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EL4K.DE and 0.18% for XGEZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4K.DE and XGEZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer