PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka DAX (ausschüttend) UCITS ETF (EL4F.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist (S6X0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL4F.DE achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than S6X0.DE's 7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EL4F.DE has underperformed S6X0.DE with an annualized return of 8.87%, while S6X0.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.39% annualized return.


EL4F.DE

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
1.34%
6M
3.38%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
8.87%

S6X0.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
1.98%
YTD
7.30%
6M
8.70%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL4F.DE
Deka DAX (ausschüttend) UCITS ETF
1.34%22.54%18.07%19.54%-12.81%15.13%2.76%24.66%-18.50%12.62%
S6X0.DE
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist
7.30%22.02%10.94%22.42%-8.98%23.10%-3.21%30.30%-13.84%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4F.DE and S6X0.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2009

0.61

Over the past year, EL4F.DE and S6X0.DE have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4F.DE
EL4F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EL4F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

S6X0.DE
S6X0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
S6X0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S6X0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
S6X0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
S6X0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
S6X0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka DAX (ausschüttend) UCITS ETF (EL4F.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist (S6X0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL4F.DES6X0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.18

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

1.44

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

4.89

-4.32

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the S6X0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4F.DE and S6X0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL4F.DES6X0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

0.98

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.51

-0.15

Drawdowns

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4F.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, which is greater than S6X0.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4F.DE and S6X0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4F.DES6X0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.08%

-38.54%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-10.88%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.79%

-16.56%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-23.41%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.59%

-38.54%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.51%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-6.82%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.21%

+0.77%

Volatility

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka DAX (ausschüttend) UCITS ETF (EL4F.DE) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist (S6X0.DE) have volatilities of 5.16% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4F.DES6X0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

4.96%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

12.92%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

15.93%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

17.56%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

20.60%

-2.35%

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL4F.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than S6X0.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL4F.DE vs. S6X0.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than S6X0.DE's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL4F.DE
Deka DAX (ausschüttend) UCITS ETF
1.80%1.82%2.10%2.63%2.72%1.86%2.19%2.42%2.94%2.76%2.66%2.70%
S6X0.DE
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Dist
2.78%2.99%3.38%3.17%3.10%2.47%2.53%3.48%3.69%2.92%3.18%3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EL4F.DE and S6X0.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, S6X0.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S6X0.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EL4F.DE.

EL4F.DE tracks DAX®, while S6X0.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EL4F.DE and 0.05% for S6X0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4F.DE and S6X0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer