PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka DAX UCITS ETF (EL4A.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL4A.DE achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than DBXI.DE's 14.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EL4A.DE has underperformed DBXI.DE with an annualized return of 8.89%, while DBXI.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.


EL4A.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
1.28%
6M
3.34%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
8.89%

DBXI.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
2.55%
YTD
14.49%
6M
18.42%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
28.95%
5Y*
19.73%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL4A.DE
Deka DAX UCITS ETF
1.28%22.57%18.09%19.52%-12.77%15.21%3.01%24.61%-18.58%12.49%
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF
14.49%37.50%18.27%33.40%-9.08%26.51%-4.28%33.02%-14.48%16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4A.DE and DBXI.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008

0.72

The correlation between EL4A.DE and DBXI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4A.DE
EL4A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EL4A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXI.DE
DBXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka DAX UCITS ETF (EL4A.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL4A.DEDBXI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.34

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

3.17

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

11.42

-10.86

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4A.DE and DBXI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL4A.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

1.94

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.09

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.19

+0.18

Drawdowns

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.64%, smaller than the maximum DBXI.DE drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4A.DE and DBXI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4A.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.64%

-69.49%

+22.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-9.62%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.89%

-17.56%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-25.10%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

-40.46%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-0.77%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-29.56%

+20.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.67%

+1.31%

Volatility

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka DAX UCITS ETF (EL4A.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) at 4.63%. This indicates that EL4A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4A.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.63%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

12.34%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

15.69%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

18.31%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

20.37%

-2.01%

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL4A.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EL4A.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF
3.63%3.93%4.53%3.78%7.45%0.94%4.23%3.33%2.66%1.94%2.51%0.15%
EL4A.DE
Deka DAX UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.56%0.65%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


EL4A.DE and DBXI.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EL4A.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EL4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

EL4A.DE tracks DAX®, while DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: Deka and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EL4A.DE and 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4A.DE and DBXI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer