PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Corporates Diversified UCITS ETF (EL49.DE) and PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL49.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than COVR.DE's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EL49.DE has outperformed COVR.DE with an annualized return of 0.63%, while COVR.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.53% annualized return.


EL49.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.04%
1Y
1.39%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
0.63%

COVR.DE

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
0.65%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
0.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL49.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Corporates Diversified UCITS ETF
0.49%2.66%4.06%7.13%-13.01%-1.51%1.80%5.80%-1.28%0.93%
COVR.DE
PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.22%2.66%3.80%6.11%-12.85%-2.27%3.03%3.98%0.05%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EL49.DE and COVR.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.62

The correlation between EL49.DE and COVR.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL49.DE
EL49.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EL49.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL49.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL49.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EL49.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL49.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

COVR.DE
COVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
COVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Corporates Diversified UCITS ETF (EL49.DE) and PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL49.DECOVR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.23

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

0.65

+0.87

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL49.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the COVR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL49.DE and COVR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL49.DECOVR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.26

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.13

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.18

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.21

+0.26

Drawdowns

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL49.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, roughly equal to the maximum COVR.DE drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL49.DE and COVR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL49.DECOVR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.77%

-16.36%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.85%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.05%

-2.85%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.77%

-15.69%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.77%

-16.36%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-4.21%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-4.10%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.00%

-0.08%

Volatility

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Corporates Diversified UCITS ETF (EL49.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE) at 0.92%. This indicates that EL49.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COVR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL49.DECOVR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.92%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

2.11%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

2.48%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

3.77%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

2.98%

+2.27%

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL49.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than COVR.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

EL49.DE vs. COVR.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL49.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than COVR.DE's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COVR.DE
PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist
2.49%2.43%1.66%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.42%1.20%0.78%0.57%0.74%0.86%
EL49.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Corporates Diversified UCITS ETF
3.49%3.50%3.24%3.04%0.75%0.69%0.69%0.88%0.75%1.15%1.52%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


EL49.DE and COVR.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EL49.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EL49.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for COVR.DE.

EL49.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Corporates Diversified, while COVR.DE tracks PIMCO Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: Deka and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EL49.DE and 0.43% for COVR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL49.DE and COVR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer