PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Germany Covered Diversified UCITS ETF (EL48.DE) and JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JER5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL48.DE achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than JER5.DE's 0.48% return.


EL48.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.11%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
0.83%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
-0.41%

JER5.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.48%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EL48.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Germany Covered Diversified UCITS ETF
0.11%2.29%2.95%5.23%-14.85%-2.18%1.63%2.29%0.34%
JER5.DE
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.48%3.43%4.31%6.22%-7.82%-0.27%0.75%2.43%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EL48.DE and JER5.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2018

0.57

The correlation between EL48.DE and JER5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL48.DE
EL48.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EL48.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL48.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL48.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EL48.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL48.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

JER5.DE
JER5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
JER5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
JER5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Germany Covered Diversified UCITS ETF (EL48.DE) and JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JER5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL48.DEJER5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.04

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

3.74

-2.97

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL48.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the JER5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL48.DE and JER5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL48.DEJER5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.05

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.44

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.39

-0.24

Drawdowns

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL48.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.24%, which is greater than JER5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL48.DE and JER5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL48.DEJER5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.24%

-10.17%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-1.98%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.22%

-1.98%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.05%

-10.17%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.55%

-0.46%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-2.25%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.55%

+0.30%

Volatility

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Germany Covered Diversified UCITS ETF (EL48.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JER5.DE) at 0.58%. This indicates that EL48.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JER5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL48.DEJER5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

0.58%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

1.73%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

1.96%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

2.55%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.60%

3.10%

+0.50%

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL48.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than JER5.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL48.DE vs. JER5.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL48.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while JER5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL48.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Germany Covered Diversified UCITS ETF
2.07%2.45%1.70%1.66%0.19%0.15%0.19%0.28%0.28%0.87%0.90%0.94%
JER5.DE
JPMorgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EL48.DE and JER5.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JER5.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JER5.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EL48.DE.

EL48.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Germany Covered Diversified, while JER5.DE tracks JP Morgan EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 Research Enhanced Index (ESG). They also come from different issuers: Deka and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EL48.DE and 0.04% for JER5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL48.DE and JER5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer