PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF (EL45.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL45.DE achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 19.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EL45.DE has outperformed EUNN.DE with an annualized return of 383.57%, while EUNN.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.


EL45.DE

1D
-1.72%
1M
-0.71%
6M
10.63%
YTD
15.53%
1Y
31.86%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
383.57%

EUNN.DE

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.40%
6M
13.09%
YTD
19.15%
1Y
37.78%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL45.DE
Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF
15.53%10.57%11.51%12.77%-14.83%9.65%491,262.69%840.15%41.10%6,472.17%
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
19.15%13.46%12.91%15.16%-11.48%9.24%4.12%22.22%-10.32%10.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EL45.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2009

0.83

The correlation between EL45.DE and EUNN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (10 years) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL45.DE
EL45.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EL45.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL45.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL45.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EL45.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL45.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNN.DE
EUNN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF (EL45.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EL45.DEEUNN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.92

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

13.10

-3.53

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL45.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL45.DE and EUNN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL45.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum EUNN.DE drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL45.DE and EUNN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL45.DEEUNN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.54%

-28.56%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-9.58%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.76%

-15.81%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

-19.41%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.36%

-28.56%

+6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-2.95%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-6.83%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.88%

+0.59%

Volatility

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF (EL45.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) at 6.09%. This indicates that EL45.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL45.DEEUNN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

6.09%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

15.55%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

18.90%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

16.24%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21,842.13%

16.12%

+21,826.01%

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL45.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EL45.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL45.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while EUNN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL45.DE
Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF
1.46%1.77%1.49%1.64%1.95%2.07%165.19%81.94%42.51%159.77%62.28%103.93%
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EL45.DE and EUNN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for EL45.DE.

EL45.DE tracks MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG Select CTB Index, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. They also come from different issuers: Deka and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for EL45.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL45.DE and EUNN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer