EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

EL45.DE (Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF) and ELFB.DE (Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EL45.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG Select CTB Index, while ELFB.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Solactive Eurozone Sustainability. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EL45.DE returned 383.57%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for ELFB.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EL45.DE charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ELFB.DE.

Performance

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF (EL45.DE) and Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL45.DE achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than ELFB.DE's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EL45.DE has outperformed ELFB.DE with an annualized return of 383.57%, while ELFB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.70% annualized return.

EL45.DE

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 10.63%
• YTD: 15.53%
• 1Y: 31.86%
• 3Y*: 14.27%
• 5Y*: 7.46%
• 10Y*: 383.57%

ELFB.DE

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 10.35%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 29.29%
• 3Y*: 25.20%
• 5Y*: 17.65%
• 10Y*: 13.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EL45.DE Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF	15.53%	10.57%	11.51%	12.77%	-14.83%	9.65%	491,262.69%	840.15%	41.10%	6,472.17%
ELFB.DE Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF	13.16%	34.01%	20.68%	31.84%	-16.00%	32.48%	-2.72%	29.42%	-18.76%	11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EL45.DE and ELFB.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2015	0.48

The correlation between EL45.DE and ELFB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (10 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL45.DE

EL45.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
EL45.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EL45.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EL45.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EL45.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EL45.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ELFB.DE

ELFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
ELFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ELFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ELFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ELFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ELFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF (EL45.DE) and Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EL45.DE	ELFB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.54	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.31	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.32	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.57	8.53	+1.04

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL45.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the ELFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL45.DE and ELFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL45.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum ELFB.DE drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL45.DE and ELFB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EL45.DE	ELFB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.54%	-42.73%	+19.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-12.55%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.76%	-16.39%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.28%	-29.58%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.36%	-42.73%	+20.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	-2.41%	-3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.86%	-8.05%	+2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.42%	+0.05%

Volatility

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF (EL45.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF (ELFB.DE) at 4.78%. This indicates that EL45.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EL45.DE	ELFB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.50%	4.78%	+2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.07%	15.76%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.84%	18.94%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	19.77%	-2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21,842.13%	19.82%	+21,822.31%

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL45.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than ELFB.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EL45.DE vs. ELFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL45.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than ELFB.DE's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EL45.DE Deka MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG CTB UCITS ETF	1.46%	1.77%	1.49%	1.64%	1.95%	2.07%	165.19%	81.94%	42.51%	159.77%	62.28%	103.93%
ELFB.DE Deka Oekom Euro Nachhaltigkeit UCITS ETF	2.26%	2.18%	2.63%	2.73%	3.03%	1.77%	1.12%	3.22%	1.26%	2.56%	2.77%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EL45.DE and ELFB.DE in my portfolio?

EL45.DE and ELFB.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EL45.DE or ELFB.DE?

On fees, EL45.DE is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EL45.DE or ELFB.DE?

EL45.DE is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ELFB.DE.

What is the main difference between EL45.DE and ELFB.DE?

EL45.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while ELFB.DE is Europe Equities. EL45.DE tracks MSCI Japan Climate Change ESG Select CTB Index, while ELFB.DE tracks Solactive Eurozone Sustainability. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for EL45.DE and 0.40% for ELFB.DE.