EKG vs. XHE
EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) and XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EKG tracks the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index while XHE tracks the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EKG returned -0.66%/yr vs -6.55%/yr for XHE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EKG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHE.
Performance
EKG vs. XHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly higher than XHE's -11.53% return.
EKG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -10.11%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -11.53%
- 6M
- -11.43%
- 1Y
- -4.18%
- 3Y*
- -6.55%
- 5Y*
- -8.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
EKG vs. XHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | -10.11% | 11.89% | 6.53% | -0.11% | -19.59% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -11.53% | -0.23% | 5.08% | -6.23% | -15.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKG and XHE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EKG and XHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
EKG vs. XHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EKG
XHE
Healthcare
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
EKG
XHE
Technology
EKG
XHE
-
Basic Materials
EKG
-
XHE
-
Communication Services
EKG
-
XHE
Consumer Cyclical
EKG
-
XHE
-
Consumer Defensive
EKG
-
XHE
-
Energy
EKG
-
XHE
-
Financial Services
EKG
-
XHE
Industrials
EKG
-
XHE
Real Estate
EKG
-
XHE
-
Utilities
EKG
-
XHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKG vs. XHE — Risk / Return Rank
EKG
XHE
EKG vs. XHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKG | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | -0.23 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | -0.52 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKG | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | -0.20 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.40 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
EKG vs. XHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, smaller than the maximum XHE drawdown of -49.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and XHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKG | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -49.92% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -18.29% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.49% | -32.62% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -41.34% | +20.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -13.27% | -9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 8.06% | +1.67% |
Volatility
EKG vs. XHE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) at 5.69%. This indicates that EKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKG | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 5.69% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 15.34% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 21.36% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 24.40% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 22.93% | +4.14% |
EKG vs. XHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XHE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKG vs. XHE - Dividend Comparison
EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EKG and XHE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EKG has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to XHE (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKG dropped -43.82% vs XHE's -49.92%.
On 3-year performance, EKG leads with -0.66% vs -6.55% for XHE. On fees, XHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EKG has performed better with a -0.66% return vs -6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EKG.
XHE has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for EKG.
EKG tracks NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EKG and 0.35% for XHE.
EKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EKG and XHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer