EKG vs. PSCH
EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) and PSCH (Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EKG tracks the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index while PSCH tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EKG returned -0.66%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PSCH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EKG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCH.
Performance
EKG vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than PSCH's 1.80% return.
EKG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -10.11%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCH
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- -5.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
EKG vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | -10.11% | 11.89% | 6.53% | -0.11% | -19.59% |
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 1.80% | -0.49% | 3.77% | -2.71% | -15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKG and PSCH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EKG and PSCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
EKG vs. PSCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EKG
PSCH
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
EKG
PSCH
Technology
EKG
PSCH
Basic Materials
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Communication Services
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Consumer Cyclical
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Consumer Defensive
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Energy
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Financial Services
EKG
-
PSCH
Industrials
EKG
-
PSCH
Real Estate
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Utilities
EKG
-
PSCH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKG vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank
EKG
PSCH
EKG vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKG | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.10 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.67 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 1.84 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKG | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.51 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.51 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
EKG vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, smaller than the maximum PSCH drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and PSCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKG | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -46.32% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -15.36% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.49% | -22.98% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -30.59% | +9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -13.46% | -9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 5.54% | +4.19% |
Volatility
EKG vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) at 4.19%. This indicates that EKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKG | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 4.19% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 14.06% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 20.26% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 22.89% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 23.63% | +3.44% |
EKG vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKG vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison
EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.27% | 0.01% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EKG and PSCH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EKG has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to PSCH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKG dropped -43.82% vs PSCH's -46.32%.
On 3-year performance, PSCH leads with 0.45% vs -0.66% for EKG. On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSCH has performed better with a 0.45% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EKG.
PSCH has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for EKG.
EKG tracks NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EKG and 0.29% for PSCH.
PSCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EKG and PSCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer