PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKG vs. AGNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EKG vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EKG vs. AGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EKG
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF
-14.04%11.89%6.53%-0.11%-19.59%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
0.54%20.01%7.03%9.65%-4.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -14.04% return, which is significantly lower than AGNG's 0.54% return.


EKG

1D
0.64%
1M
-8.58%
YTD
-14.04%
6M
-6.60%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
-1.55%
5Y*
10Y*

AGNG

1D
1.38%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
0.54%
6M
6.00%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EKG vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EKG vs. AGNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKG
EKG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
EKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNG
AGNG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKG vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EKGAGNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

1.08

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

1.57

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.20

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

1.61

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.67

5.49

-4.82

EKG vs. AGNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKG Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the AGNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKG and AGNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EKGAGNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

1.08

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.58

-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between EKG and AGNG is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EKG vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison

EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EKG
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
0.87%0.88%0.83%0.96%0.49%0.72%0.36%0.83%1.00%1.04%0.45%

Drawdowns

EKG vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than AGNG's maximum drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and AGNG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EKGAGNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.82%

-30.58%

-13.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-10.16%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.25%

-6.11%

-18.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-5.92%

-16.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

2.98%

+3.56%

Volatility

EKG vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) at 5.49%. This indicates that EKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EKGAGNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

5.49%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

9.55%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.71%

15.99%

+8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

15.10%

+11.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.07%

17.17%

+9.90%