EIVPX vs. CIHEX
EIVPX (Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund) and CIHEX (Calamos Hedged Equity Fund) are both Options Trading funds. Over the past 5 years, EIVPX returned 9.84%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for CIHEX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EIVPX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for CIHEX.
Performance
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIVPX achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than CIHEX's 5.21% return.
EIVPX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CIHEX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 5.68% | 12.90% | 16.45% | 16.83% | -8.64% | 17.96% | 4.74% | 15.46% | -2.80% | 8.71% |
CIHEX Calamos Hedged Equity Fund | 5.21% | 11.36% | 14.96% | 15.88% | -11.11% | 13.31% | 9.66% | 14.47% | 0.87% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIVPX and CIHEX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EIVPX and CIHEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIVPX vs. CIHEX — Risk / Return Rank
EIVPX
CIHEX
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) and Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIVPX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.41 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 3.22 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.72 | 13.74 | +8.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIVPX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, which is greater than CIHEX's maximum drawdown of -17.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIVPX and CIHEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIVPX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -17.80% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -4.68% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -9.80% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | -15.77% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.37% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -2.31% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 1.09% | -0.33% |
Volatility
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Volatility Comparison
Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX) at 2.60%. This indicates that EIVPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIHEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIVPX | CIHEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 2.60% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 5.25% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 6.80% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.84% | 9.20% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 9.42% | +2.39% |
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIVPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CIHEX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIVPX vs. CIHEX - Dividend Comparison
EIVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than CIHEX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIHEX Calamos Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.44% | 1.03% | 0.99% | 3.16% | 0.85% | 1.29% | 1.69% |
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 3.80% | 4.01% | 2.67% | 5.09% | 7.95% | 1.22% | 0.75% | 1.23% | 1.24% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EIVPX and CIHEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EIVPX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to CIHEX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIVPX dropped -26.67% vs CIHEX's -17.80%.
EIVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIVPX and CIHEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer