PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIVPX vs. BUIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EIVPX having a 6.16% return and BUIGX slightly higher at 6.34%.


EIVPX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.83%
YTD
6.16%
6M
6.77%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*

BUIGX

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.01%
YTD
6.34%
6M
6.77%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIVPX
Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund
6.16%12.90%16.45%16.83%-8.64%17.96%4.74%15.46%-2.80%8.71%
BUIGX
Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund
6.34%11.51%15.54%19.05%-9.88%12.51%10.57%17.71%-2.19%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EIVPX and BUIGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2017

0.91

The correlation between EIVPX and BUIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIVPX vs. BUIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIVPX
EIVPX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EIVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EIVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BUIGX
BUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIVPXBUIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.45

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

3.45

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.51

17.58

+7.93

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIVPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the BUIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIVPX and BUIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIVPXBUIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.93

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.81

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.81

-0.04

Drawdowns

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIVPX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, which is greater than BUIGX's maximum drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIVPX and BUIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIVPXBUIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-22.01%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-5.12%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-13.94%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.07%

-15.22%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.17%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-2.32%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

1.00%

-0.29%

Volatility

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) is 0.96%, while Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that EIVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIVPXBUIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.03%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

7.94%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.38%

9.17%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.79%

11.53%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.81%

11.69%

+0.12%

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIVPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUIGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIVPX vs. BUIGX - Dividend Comparison

EIVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while BUIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUIGX
Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%0.68%0.00%0.00%
EIVPX
Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund
3.78%4.01%2.67%5.09%7.95%1.22%0.75%1.23%1.24%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EIVPX and BUIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BUIGX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to EIVPX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIVPX dropped -26.67% vs BUIGX's -22.01%.

EIVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIVPX and BUIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer