PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EINFX vs. SSBWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elfun Income Fund (EINFX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINFX achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than SSBWX's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EINFX has underperformed SSBWX with an annualized return of 1.34%, while SSBWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


EINFX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
1.34%

SSBWX

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.25%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.73%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EINFX
Elfun Income Fund
-0.17%7.35%-0.73%4.75%-13.82%-1.57%7.81%9.51%-0.86%3.91%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.53%15.92%9.76%15.66%-17.17%10.75%17.27%22.52%-6.23%16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EINFX and SSBWX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.19

Over the past year, EINFX and SSBWX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EINFX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINFX
EINFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EINFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
EINFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBWX
SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elfun Income Fund (EINFX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EINFXSSBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.50

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.04

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

13.49

-9.17

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINFX and SSBWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EINFXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.53

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.59

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.79

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.72

+0.06

Drawdowns

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINFX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum SSBWX drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINFX and SSBWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EINFXSSBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-23.73%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-6.20%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.10%

-9.73%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-23.73%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.78%

-23.73%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-0.40%

-5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-4.17%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.39%

-0.26%

Volatility

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Elfun Income Fund (EINFX) is 1.46%, while State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that EINFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EINFXSSBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

2.36%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

5.97%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

7.44%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.50%

10.65%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

11.33%

-6.10%

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINFX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EINFX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

EINFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than SSBWX's 6.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINFX
Elfun Income Fund
3.86%3.84%3.04%2.76%4.09%3.31%3.15%2.78%2.88%2.42%3.34%2.87%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.43%6.91%6.16%4.11%5.78%6.18%4.92%6.65%5.24%0.46%1.75%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EINFX and SSBWX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSBWX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to EINFX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINFX dropped -19.78% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.

SSBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EINFX and SSBWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer