EILTX vs. EISMX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EILTX (Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund) and EISMX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - EILTX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EISMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EILTX returned 2.30%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for EISMX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. EILTX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EISMX.

Performance

EILTX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund (EILTX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EILTX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than EISMX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EILTX has underperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.

EILTX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

EISMX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.86%
• 6M: -4.28%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 1Y: -3.49%
• 3Y*: 6.26%
• 5Y*: 4.72%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EILTX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EILTX Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund	0.73%	6.86%	1.65%	6.40%	-7.31%	1.05%	5.63%	7.35%	0.37%	6.12%
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund	1.36%	-5.66%	17.64%	14.01%	-8.77%	22.02%	11.31%	34.37%	-5.55%	24.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EILTX and EISMX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	-0.07

The correlation between EILTX and EISMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EILTX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EILTX

EILTX Risk / Return Rank: 63
EILTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EILTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EILTX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EILTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EILTX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

EISMX

EISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2
EISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EILTX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund (EILTX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EILTX	EISMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	-0.20	+2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	-0.18	+3.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	0.98	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	-0.21	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	-0.39	+5.40

EILTX vs. EISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EILTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the EISMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EILTX and EISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EILTX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EILTX drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EILTX and EISMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EILTX	EISMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-45.32%	+32.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.64%	-14.66%	+11.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.13%	-19.39%	+12.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.27%	-19.81%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.27%	-39.95%	+26.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-9.90%	+8.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.39%	-5.85%	+3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	8.05%	-6.84%

Volatility

EILTX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund (EILTX) is 0.57%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that EILTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EILTX	EISMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.57%	4.40%	-3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.18%	11.59%	-9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67%	15.70%	-13.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.02%	17.15%	-13.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	18.82%	-14.74%

EILTX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EILTX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

EILTX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison

EILTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than EISMX's 6.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EILTX Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund	3.23%	3.92%	3.70%	2.17%	2.20%	1.65%	1.80%	2.46%	2.08%	1.94%	1.61%	2.30%
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund	6.34%	6.43%	7.26%	2.78%	10.37%	10.49%	9.80%	6.52%	7.20%	3.30%	3.58%	6.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EILTX and EISMX in my portfolio?

EILTX and EISMX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EILTX or EISMX?

EISMX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to EILTX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EILTX dropped -13.27% vs EISMX's -45.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EILTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.