EIHMX vs. EISMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX).
EIHMX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 3, 1993. EISMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | -0.23% | 3.93% | 2.56% | 7.23% | -9.70% | 1.73% | 6.06% | 8.74% | 2.04% | 4.95% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | -4.80% | -5.66% | 17.64% | 14.01% | -8.77% | 22.02% | 11.31% | 34.37% | -5.55% | 24.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIHMX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EIHMX has underperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.
EIHMX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
EISMX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- 1Y
- -6.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIHMX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIHMX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIHMX
EISMX
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIHMX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | -0.31 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | -0.33 | +1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.96 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | -0.36 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | -0.82 | +3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIHMX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | -0.31 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.24 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.53 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIHMX and EISMX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison
EIHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than EISMX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | 4.02% | 4.99% | 4.38% | 3.21% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 2.90% | 3.88% | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.10% | 4.12% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | 6.75% | 6.43% | 7.26% | 2.78% | 10.37% | 10.49% | 9.80% | 6.52% | 7.20% | 3.30% | 3.58% | 6.70% |
Drawdowns
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIHMX drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIHMX and EISMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIHMX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.87% | -45.32% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.46% | -14.66% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -19.81% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.32% | -39.95% | +24.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -15.38% | +12.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -5.77% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 6.43% | -4.52% |
Volatility
EIHMX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) is 1.28%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that EIHMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIHMX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 4.80% | -3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 11.30% | -9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.72% | 18.96% | -13.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 17.09% | -12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 18.83% | -14.43% |