EIDO vs. EPHE
EIDO (iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF) and EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIDO is a Indonesia Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while EPHE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIDO returned -4.74%/yr vs -3.30%/yr for EPHE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EIDO vs. EPHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -34.24% return, which is significantly lower than EPHE's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed EPHE with an annualized return of -4.74%, while EPHE has yielded a comparatively higher -3.30% annualized return.
EIDO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -35.38%
- YTD
- -34.24%
- 1Y
- -29.57%
- 3Y*
- -17.00%
- 5Y*
- -6.72%
- 10Y*
- -4.74%
EPHE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- -3.30%
EIDO vs. EPHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | -34.24% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 2.56% | -0.16% | -0.60% | -7.13% | 5.30% | -10.88% | 19.40% |
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 3.02% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIDO and EPHE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between EIDO and EPHE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EIDO vs. EPHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIDO
EPHE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Technology
-
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EIDO
EPHE
Basic Materials
EIDO
EPHE
Communication Services
EIDO
EPHE
Energy
EIDO
EPHE
Consumer Defensive
EIDO
EPHE
Industrials
EIDO
EPHE
Technology
EIDO
EPHE
-
Real Estate
EIDO
EPHE
Consumer Cyclical
EIDO
EPHE
Utilities
EIDO
EPHE
Healthcare
EIDO
EPHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIDO vs. EPHE — Risk / Return Rank
EIDO
EPHE
EIDO vs. EPHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIDO | EPHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.97 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.34 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | -0.62 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIDO vs. EPHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than EPHE's maximum drawdown of -53.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and EPHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIDO | EPHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -53.82% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.81% | -15.90% | -27.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.77% | -21.42% | -30.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.77% | -32.96% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.41% | -51.62% | -7.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.12% | -31.88% | -23.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.83% | -21.06% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.01% | 9.15% | +7.86% |
Volatility
EIDO vs. EPHE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) have volatilities of 9.48% and 9.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIDO | EPHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 9.65% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.25% | 15.95% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.99% | 20.60% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 18.46% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 22.28% | +2.71% |
EIDO vs. EPHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EIDO and EPHE have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EIDO vs. EPHE - Dividend Comparison
EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than EPHE's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | 3.39% | 3.56% | 5.20% | 2.94% | 2.53% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.78% | 1.99% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.67% |
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.70% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIDO and EPHE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPHE has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to EIDO (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs EPHE's -53.82%.
On 10-year performance, EPHE leads with -3.30% vs -4.74% for EIDO. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EIDO has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPHE has performed better with a -3.30% return vs -4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIDO and EPHE have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.70% for EPHE.
EIDO is categorized as Indonesia Equities, while EPHE is Asia Pacific Equities. EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index.
EPHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIDO and EPHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer