EICOX vs. RLEMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EICOX (Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund) and RLEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EICOX returned 11.94%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for RLEMX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EICOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RLEMX.

Performance

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICOX achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly lower than RLEMX's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EICOX has outperformed RLEMX with an annualized return of 11.94%, while RLEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.

EICOX

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: -3.95%
• 6M: 5.58%
• YTD: 16.70%
• 1Y: 30.87%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: 11.94%
• ALL TIME*: 9.50%

RLEMX

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 13.36%
• YTD: 24.08%
• 1Y: 46.85%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: 9.84%
• ALL TIME*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RLEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	16.70%	33.22%	11.99%	25.78%	-14.59%	13.43%	13.46%	12.59%	-14.57%	31.41%
RLEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6	24.08%	41.38%	7.60%	22.42%	-14.86%	5.43%	-0.02%	17.99%	-18.11%	28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EICOX and RLEMX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.83

The correlation between EICOX and RLEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EICOX vs. RLEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EICOX

EICOX Risk / Return Rank: 54
EICOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EICOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EICOX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EICOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EICOX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RLEMX

RLEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
RLEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RLEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RLEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RLEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EICOX	RLEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.94	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.80	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.52	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	4.18	-2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	14.19	-7.71

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the RLEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICOX and RLEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICOX drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, smaller than the maximum RLEMX drawdown of -44.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICOX and RLEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EICOX	RLEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.75%	-44.12%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.22%	-10.41%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.22%	-14.25%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.46%	-29.17%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.75%	-44.12%	+5.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.58%	-2.25%	-8.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-10.36%	+1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	3.07%	+1.41%

Volatility

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6 (RLEMX) at 5.13%. This indicates that EICOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EICOX	RLEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	5.13%	+4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.59%	12.94%	+6.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.85%	14.84%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.98%	14.60%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.17%	16.39%	-2.22%

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than RLEMX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

EICOX vs. RLEMX - Dividend Comparison

EICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than RLEMX's 1.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	3.16%	3.68%	2.02%	1.95%	5.72%	2.71%	0.10%	2.00%	2.95%	0.00%	0.59%	2.35%
RLEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Class R6	1.65%	2.05%	3.10%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EICOX and RLEMX in my portfolio?

EICOX and RLEMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EICOX or RLEMX?

EICOX has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to RLEMX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICOX dropped -38.75% vs RLEMX's -44.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.