PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EICOX vs. GTDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICOX achieves a 27.67% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 49.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EICOX has outperformed GTDDX with an annualized return of 13.62%, while GTDDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.


EICOX

1D
0.34%
1M
10.85%
YTD
27.67%
6M
31.74%
1Y
52.16%
3Y*
28.97%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
13.62%

GTDDX

1D
1.53%
1M
21.98%
YTD
49.96%
6M
55.26%
1Y
78.97%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EICOX
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund
27.67%33.22%11.99%25.78%-14.59%13.43%13.46%12.59%-14.57%31.41%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
49.96%29.88%-0.66%8.82%-17.70%-7.00%17.19%29.99%-18.77%30.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EICOX and GTDDX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.81

The correlation between EICOX and GTDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EICOX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EICOX
EICOX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EICOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EICOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EICOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EICOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EICOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GTDDX
GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EICOXGTDDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

4.11

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.16

4.96

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.74

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

5.47

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.07

21.76

-6.69

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the GTDDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICOX and GTDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EICOXGTDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

4.11

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.55

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.62

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.35

+0.42

Drawdowns

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICOX drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, smaller than the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICOX and GTDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EICOXGTDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.75%

-62.89%

+24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-14.49%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-16.08%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-37.56%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

-39.58%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.69%

-18.75%

+10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.63%

-0.15%

Volatility

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) is 7.29%, while Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that EICOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EICOXGTDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

7.89%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

16.72%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

19.29%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

16.38%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.61%

16.91%

-3.30%

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

EICOX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison

EICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than GTDDX's 14.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EICOX
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund
2.89%3.68%2.02%1.95%5.72%2.71%0.10%2.00%2.95%0.00%0.59%2.35%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
14.09%21.13%1.16%1.51%1.17%4.46%5.05%1.49%1.53%0.71%0.86%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EICOX and GTDDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTDDX has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to EICOX (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICOX dropped -38.75% vs GTDDX's -62.89%.

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EICOX and GTDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer