EICAX vs. NQP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EICAX (Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I) and NQP (Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EICAX charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for NQP.

Performance

EICAX vs. NQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I (EICAX) and Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EICAX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 8.03%
• 3Y*: 4.46%
• 5Y*: 1.60%
• 10Y*: 2.55%

NQP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EICAX vs. NQP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EICAX Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I	1.96%	4.17%	3.65%	5.65%	-7.43%	0.67%	5.58%	8.99%	1.31%	4.84%
NQP Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income	3.84%	15.46%	2.70%	7.44%	-21.95%	7.75%	7.08%	21.21%	-2.28%	5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between EICAX and NQP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.39

The correlation between EICAX and NQP shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EICAX vs. NQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EICAX

EICAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
EICAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EICAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EICAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EICAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EICAX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EICAX vs. NQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I (EICAX) and Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EICAX	NQP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EICAX	NQP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EICAX	NQP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.33%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EICAX	NQP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.69%	—	—

EICAX vs. NQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than NQP's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

EICAX vs. NQP - Dividend Comparison

EICAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than NQP's 7.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EICAX Eaton Vance California Municipal Opportunities Fund Class I	3.75%	4.61%	4.17%	2.57%	2.34%	1.76%	2.27%	3.62%	2.85%	2.76%	3.00%	3.77%
NQP Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income	7.13%	7.87%	6.69%	3.07%	4.89%	4.51%	4.38%	4.23%	5.34%	5.34%	5.67%	6.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EICAX and NQP in my portfolio?

EICAX and NQP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.