EIBAX vs. SMTRX
EIBAX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund) and SMTRX (ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EIBAX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SMTRX.
Performance
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EIBAX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 5.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
SMTRX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EIBAX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund | 0.22% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIBAX and SMTRX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIBAX vs. SMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
EIBAX
SMTRX
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIBAX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIBAX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | -2.96 | +3.77 |
Drawdowns
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIBAX drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than SMTRX's maximum drawdown of -0.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIBAX and SMTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIBAX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -0.21% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -0.21% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.08% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIBAX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.09% | 2.47% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 2.47% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 2.47% | +2.23% |
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIBAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SMTRX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIBAX vs. SMTRX - Dividend Comparison
EIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than SMTRX's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIBAX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund | 5.15% | 5.13% | 5.58% | 4.01% | 4.04% | 3.49% | 3.87% | 3.97% | 4.16% | 3.55% | 3.90% | 5.69% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EIBAX and SMTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for EIBAX and SMTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer