EHLS vs. MARB
EHLS (Even Herd Long Short ETF) and MARB (First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EHLS returned 23.69% vs 6.18% for MARB. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHLS charges 1.58%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for MARB.
Performance
EHLS vs. MARB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHLS achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than MARB's 1.26% return.
EHLS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- —
EHLS vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 15.59% | 6.67% | 11.57% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.26% | 7.02% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHLS and MARB is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 0.03 |
EHLS vs. MARB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EHLS
MARB
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
EHLS
MARB
Industrials
EHLS
MARB
Energy
EHLS
MARB
-
Technology
EHLS
MARB
Healthcare
EHLS
MARB
Basic Materials
EHLS
MARB
-
Utilities
EHLS
MARB
-
Real Estate
EHLS
MARB
Communication Services
EHLS
MARB
Consumer Cyclical
EHLS
MARB
Consumer Defensive
EHLS
MARB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHLS vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank
EHLS
MARB
EHLS vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHLS | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.56 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 20.98 | -13.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHLS | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.36 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
EHLS vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than MARB's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and MARB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHLS | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -11.99% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | -2.43% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -0.00% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -1.40% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 0.30% | +2.78% |
Volatility
EHLS vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison
Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) at 0.47%. This indicates that EHLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHLS | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 0.47% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 2.18% | +12.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 5.31% | +13.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 4.27% | +15.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 5.60% | +14.16% |
EHLS vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHLS vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison
EHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 2.98% | 3.01% | 2.11% | 2.20% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHLS and MARB have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EHLS has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to MARB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHLS dropped -18.96% vs MARB's -11.99%.
On 1-year performance, EHLS leads with 23.69% vs 6.18% for MARB. On fees, EHLS is cheaper at 1.58% per year. On volatility, MARB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EHLS has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EHLS is cheaper with a 1.58% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.
MARB has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for EHLS.
They also come from different issuers: N/A and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 2.30% for MARB.
EHLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EHLS and MARB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer