PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHLS vs. BOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHLS vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHLS achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 44.78% return.


EHLS

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.28%
6M
2.88%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.66%

BOAT

1D
-0.74%
1M
13.24%
6M
27.61%
YTD
44.78%
1Y
59.34%
3Y*
27.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.27M$891.42K$991.19K
$13.47K$14.20K$68.98K

EHLS vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
10.15%6.67%12.31%
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
44.78%22.77%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EHLS and BOAT is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.26

EHLS vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EHLS
BOAT

Financial Services

16.3%
6.6%

Technology

13.8%

-

Industrials

12.9%
29.2%

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Energy

9.3%
10.3%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%

-

Utilities

6.4%

-

Communication Services

5.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Financial Services

EHLS
16.3%
BOAT
6.6%

Technology

EHLS
13.8%
BOAT

-

Industrials

EHLS
12.9%
BOAT
29.2%

Healthcare

EHLS
11.1%
BOAT

-

Energy

EHLS
9.3%
BOAT
10.3%

Real Estate

EHLS
7.8%
BOAT

-

Basic Materials

EHLS
7.1%
BOAT

-

Utilities

EHLS
6.4%
BOAT

-

Communication Services

EHLS
5.6%
BOAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

EHLS
5.1%
BOAT

-

Consumer Defensive

EHLS
4.7%
BOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHLS vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EHLS
EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BOAT
BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EHLS vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHLSBOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

5.08

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

14.33

-9.93

EHLS vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHLS and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHLS vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum BOAT drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and BOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHLSBOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-33.94%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-11.60%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-0.74%

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-9.51%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

4.10%

-0.56%

Volatility

EHLS vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) is 5.04%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that EHLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHLSBOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

7.09%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

16.87%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

20.73%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

25.07%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

25.07%

-5.51%

EHLS vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EHLS vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

EHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
6.35%8.08%13.89%13.65%13.57%1.36%
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
0.00%0.00%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHLS and BOAT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOAT has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to EHLS (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHLS dropped -18.96% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

On 1-year performance, BOAT leads with 59.34% vs 16.88% for EHLS. On fees, BOAT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, EHLS has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 59.34% return vs 16.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOAT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 0.00% for EHLS.

EHLS is categorized as Long-Short, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 0.69% for BOAT.

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHLS and BOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer