PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHE.TO achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ.TO's 13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EHE.TO has underperformed ONEQ.TO with an annualized return of 9.43%, while ONEQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


EHE.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.71%
6M
3.00%
YTD
7.01%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
9.43%

ONEQ.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
0.37%
6M
9.99%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF
7.01%22.91%4.19%22.26%-10.45%23.79%-5.96%24.49%-10.68%15.40%
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
13.96%17.62%22.45%19.07%-10.74%21.65%8.21%22.22%-10.36%13.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EHE.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.33

The correlation between EHE.TO and ONEQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EHE.TO
ONEQ.TO

Industrials

22.6%
9.8%

Financial Services

15.1%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
5.2%

Technology

12.1%
30.9%

Healthcare

8.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

6.8%
6.0%

Communication Services

5.6%
6.5%

Energy

3.7%
9.8%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Industrials

EHE.TO
22.6%
ONEQ.TO
9.8%

Financial Services

EHE.TO
15.1%
ONEQ.TO
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EHE.TO
13.5%
ONEQ.TO
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

EHE.TO
12.4%
ONEQ.TO
5.2%

Technology

EHE.TO
12.1%
ONEQ.TO
30.9%

Healthcare

EHE.TO
8.1%
ONEQ.TO
5.4%

Basic Materials

EHE.TO
6.8%
ONEQ.TO
6.0%

Communication Services

EHE.TO
5.6%
ONEQ.TO
6.5%

Energy

EHE.TO
3.7%
ONEQ.TO
9.8%

Real Estate

EHE.TO

-

ONEQ.TO
3.0%

Utilities

EHE.TO

-

ONEQ.TO
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHE.TO
EHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ.TO
ONEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHE.TOONEQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.80

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

16.75

-11.34

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHE.TO and ONEQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, which is greater than ONEQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHE.TO and ONEQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHE.TOONEQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-34.40%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-6.66%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-16.08%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-17.61%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.20%

-34.40%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-1.20%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-3.69%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

1.51%

+1.63%

Volatility

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) at 2.83%. This indicates that EHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHE.TOONEQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.83%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

9.93%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

12.03%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

13.29%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

13.91%

+3.51%

Dividends

EHE.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

EHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than ONEQ.TO's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF
2.17%2.16%4.38%3.30%2.19%1.90%2.55%2.02%2.08%1.37%0.13%
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
1.60%1.60%1.05%1.53%1.38%0.89%1.22%1.39%0.94%1.03%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHE.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHE.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while ONEQ.TO is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHE.TO and ONEQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer