EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO

Last updated Jun 8, 2026

EHE.TO (CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF) and NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - EHE.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Europe CAD-Hedged Equity Index, while NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. EHE.TO is passively managed, while NXF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EHE.TO returned 9.97%/yr vs 16.74%/yr for NXF.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHE.TO achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than NXF.TO's 28.79% return.

EHE.TO

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 5.98%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: —

NXF.TO

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 28.79%
• 6M: 27.62%
• 1Y: 41.89%
• 3Y*: 14.77%
• 5Y*: 16.74%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EHE.TO CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF	5.98%	22.91%	4.20%	22.26%	-10.45%	23.79%	-5.96%	24.49%	-10.68%	15.40%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	28.79%	9.09%	-4.58%	6.48%	43.93%	40.62%	-35.30%	6.23%	-9.26%	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EHE.TO and NXF.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2016	0.17

The correlation between EHE.TO and NXF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHE.TO

EHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 29
EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
EHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

NXF.TO

NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EHE.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.27	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.91	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.37	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	4.71	-3.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.59	13.23	-8.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHE.TO and NXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EHE.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	2.27	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.72	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.21	+0.34

Drawdowns

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum NXF.TO drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHE.TO and NXF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHE.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.20%	-65.25%	+27.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	-9.41%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	-24.32%	+8.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-24.32%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-7.62%	+7.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-16.00%	+10.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.34%	-0.15%

Volatility

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) is 5.64%, while CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that EHE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EHE.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	6.80%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	15.80%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	19.56%	-3.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	23.41%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.44%	26.16%	-8.72%

Dividends

EHE.TO vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

EHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than NXF.TO's 8.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EHE.TO CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF	2.02%	2.16%	4.38%	3.30%	2.19%	1.90%	2.55%	2.02%	2.08%	1.37%	0.13%	0.00%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	8.27%	7.70%	8.50%	8.60%	11.22%	9.46%	11.24%	7.83%	9.39%	6.49%	8.24%	8.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHE.TO and NXF.TO in my portfolio?

EHE.TO and NXF.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between EHE.TO and NXF.TO?

EHE.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while NXF.TO is Energy Equities.