PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EHDL.DE) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHDL.DE achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than FLXE.DE's 14.12% return.


EHDL.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
2.53%
6M
7.80%
YTD
12.16%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
6.03%

FLXE.DE

1D
-0.79%
1M
-2.74%
6M
9.29%
YTD
14.12%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHDL.DE
Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
12.16%12.82%8.32%6.17%-10.93%22.11%-15.54%19.11%-2.44%-2.12%
FLXE.DE
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
14.12%13.48%13.20%8.79%-14.00%16.06%-8.15%15.56%-7.69%-13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EHDL.DE and FLXE.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017

0.75

The correlation between EHDL.DE and FLXE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHDL.DE
EHDL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EHDL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXE.DE
FLXE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLXE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EHDL.DE) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHDL.DEFLXE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.76

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.28

8.72

+2.56

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHDL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FLXE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHDL.DE and FLXE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHDL.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXE.DE drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHDL.DE and FLXE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHDL.DEFLXE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-37.02%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-8.38%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-14.15%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

-18.56%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-3.48%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-10.84%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.66%

-0.65%

Volatility

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EHDL.DE) is 3.05%, while Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.DE) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that EHDL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHDL.DEFLXE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

4.10%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

11.58%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

13.97%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

13.86%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

16.90%

+1.09%

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHDL.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EHDL.DE vs. FLXE.DE - Dividend Comparison

EHDL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, while FLXE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EHDL.DE
Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
4.74%5.27%5.58%6.15%9.20%5.91%4.28%5.04%5.45%5.14%2.24%
FLXE.DE
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHDL.DE and FLXE.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EHDL.DE.

EHDL.DE tracks FTSE Emerging High Dividend Low Volatility Index, while FLXE.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EHDL.DE and 0.45% for FLXE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHDL.DE and FLXE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer