PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGRW.L vs. COPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRW.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGRW.L is traded in EUR, while COPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGRW.L achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than COPA.L's 15.23% return.


EGRW.L

1D
0.10%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.24%
6M
7.76%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*

COPA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
9.76%
YTD
15.23%
6M
21.40%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EGRW.L
WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR
6.24%13.09%-2.45%20.16%-19.52%24.63%6.48%32.60%-14.26%2.49%
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
15.25%20.19%11.73%-0.42%-8.23%33.66%11.40%7.27%-16.63%15.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EGRW.L and COPA.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.13

The correlation between EGRW.L and COPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGRW.L
EGRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EGRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

COPA.L
COPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRW.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGRW.LCOPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.17

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

2.52

+0.30

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the COPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGRW.L and COPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGRW.LCOPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.85

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.32

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.11

+0.47

Drawdowns

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGRW.L drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum COPA.L drawdown of -65.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRW.L and COPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGRW.LCOPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-65.69%

+33.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-23.84%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-23.84%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.05%

-28.90%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-2.13%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-27.13%

+20.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

11.11%

-7.43%

Volatility

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRW.L) is 5.36%, while WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that EGRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGRW.LCOPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

8.24%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

18.23%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

32.80%

-16.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

25.10%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.26%

22.55%

+2.71%

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGRW.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than COPA.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGRW.L vs. COPA.L - Dividend Comparison

EGRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while COPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EGRW.L
WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR
2.09%2.15%2.28%2.00%2.30%1.72%1.04%1.61%1.94%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGRW.L and COPA.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EGRW.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EGRW.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COPA.L.

EGRW.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while COPA.L is Metals. EGRW.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EGRW.L and 0.49% for COPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGRW.L and COPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer