EGRIX vs. EMXC
EGRIX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both funds - EGRIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, EGRIX returned 8.64%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGRIX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGRIX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.
EGRIX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
EMXC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.57%
- YTD
- 37.25%
- 6M
- 42.23%
- 1Y
- 67.80%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund | 6.76% | 20.36% | 9.50% | 8.37% | -1.94% | 3.66% | 4.71% | 14.80% | -8.34% | 1.75% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.25% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGRIX and EMXC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between EGRIX and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGRIX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
EGRIX
EMXC
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGRIX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.42 | 1.50 | +0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | 4.55 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.46 | 17.51 | +2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGRIX drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRIX and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGRIX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -42.81% | +28.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.37% | -14.41% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.37% | -19.12% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.18% | -28.91% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -4.12% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -10.17% | +8.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 3.74% | -2.81% |
Volatility
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) is 0.86%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that EGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGRIX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 12.83% | -11.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 21.90% | -18.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55% | 23.90% | -20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 18.00% | -13.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 20.07% | -16.10% |
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGRIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGRIX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
EGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than EMXC's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund | 6.23% | 6.65% | 6.00% | 3.40% | 4.82% | 4.89% | 5.82% | 4.15% | 0.06% | 3.22% | 1.78% | 6.67% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGRIX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to EGRIX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGRIX dropped -14.17% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
EGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGRIX and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer