EGRIX vs. CASH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EGRIX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund) is Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while CASH (Meta Financial Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EGRIX returned 6.53%/yr vs 17.80%/yr for CASH. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EGRIX vs. CASH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) and Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGRIX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than CASH's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EGRIX has underperformed CASH with an annualized return of 6.53%, while CASH has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.

EGRIX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 13.23%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: 6.53%

CASH

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 5.41%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 13.22%
• 1Y: 13.46%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: 17.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGRIX vs. CASH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund	6.76%	20.36%	9.50%	8.37%	-1.94%	3.66%	4.71%	14.80%	-8.34%	5.78%
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc.	18.69%	-3.25%	39.47%	23.45%	-27.48%	63.82%	0.94%	89.68%	-36.81%	-9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EGRIX and CASH is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2010	0.12

The correlation between EGRIX and CASH shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EGRIX vs. CASH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGRIX

EGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CASH

CASH Risk / Return Rank: 53
CASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CASH Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CASH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGRIX vs. CASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) and Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGRIX	CASH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.36	0.39	+4.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.64	0.71	+6.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.42	1.10	+1.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.66	0.51	+5.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.46	1.01	+19.44

EGRIX vs. CASH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 5.36, which is higher than the CASH Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGRIX and CASH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EGRIX vs. CASH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGRIX drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum CASH drawdown of -83.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRIX and CASH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGRIX	CASH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.17%	-83.66%	+69.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	-22.21%	+18.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.37%	-25.20%	+21.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.18%	-50.84%	+40.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.17%	-64.90%	+50.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-15.72%	+15.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-22.89%	+21.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	11.07%	-10.14%

Volatility

EGRIX vs. CASH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund (EGRIX) is 0.86%, while Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that EGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGRIX	CASH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	7.26%	-6.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	22.61%	-19.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.55%	28.77%	-25.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.03%	33.62%	-29.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.97%	41.29%	-37.32%

Dividends

EGRIX vs. CASH - Dividend Comparison

EGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than CASH's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc.	0.24%	0.28%	0.27%	0.38%	0.46%	0.34%	0.55%	0.55%	0.96%	0.56%	0.51%	1.13%
EGRIX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund	6.23%	6.65%	6.00%	3.40%	4.82%	4.89%	5.82%	4.15%	0.06%	3.22%	1.78%	6.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGRIX and CASH in my portfolio?

EGRIX and CASH have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGRIX or CASH?

CASH has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to EGRIX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGRIX dropped -14.17% vs CASH's -83.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.