EGOV.L vs. UC99.L
EGOV.L (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - EGOV.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGOV.L returned -2.07%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for UC99.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGOV.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGOV.L achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than UC99.L's 10.42% return.
EGOV.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 0.45%
- 3Y*
- -0.82%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
UC99.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGOV.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | -1.11% | 0.21% | -2.55% | -1.25% | -7.09% | -5.75% | 5.54% | -1.92% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.42% | 8.68% | 22.60% | 27.58% | -15.03% | 28.64% | 16.43% | 7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGOV.L and UC99.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.08 |
The correlation between EGOV.L and UC99.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
EGOV.L
UC99.L
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGOV.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.43 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 3.10 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 11.14 | -10.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGOV.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 2.41 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.87 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 1.00 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGOV.L drawdown since its inception was -25.11%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGOV.L and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGOV.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.11% | -23.20% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.49% | -9.47% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.55% | -23.20% | +17.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.45% | -23.20% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.96% | 0.00% | -22.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -4.24% | -12.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.64% | -0.39% |
Volatility
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L) is 1.39%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that EGOV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGOV.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 3.33% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | 8.62% | -5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.51% | 12.19% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.13% | 16.02% | -7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 16.54% | -7.77% |
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGOV.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EGOV.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EGOV.L nor UC99.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGOV.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGOV.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGOV.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGOV.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
EGOV.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EGOV.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EGOV.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for EGOV.L and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer