PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGOG.L is traded in GBp, while GLBL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLBL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGOG.L achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLBL.L's -1.47% return.


EGOG.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
1.76%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*

GLBL.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
-2.10%
5Y*
-2.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
-0.03%3.06%2.00%3.46%-13.02%-1.80%-0.02%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
-1.47%-2.39%-2.65%-2.45%-7.22%-5.08%-2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EGOG.L and GLBL.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2020

0.15

The correlation between EGOG.L and GLBL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGOG.L
EGOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GLBL.L
GLBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGOG.LGLBL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.01

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.02

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

0.04

+2.23

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGOG.L and GLBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGOG.LGLBL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.02

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

-0.43

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

-0.16

-0.32

Drawdowns

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGOG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum GLBL.L drawdown of -25.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGOG.L and GLBL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGOG.LGLBL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-25.17%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-5.16%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.48%

-8.09%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.73%

-18.62%

+2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-24.05%

+16.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-12.84%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

2.69%

-1.47%

Volatility

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) at 1.36%. This indicates that EGOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLBL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGOG.LGLBL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

1.36%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

3.61%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

5.00%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

6.74%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

7.27%

+1.35%

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGOG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLBL.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EGOG.L vs. GLBL.L - Dividend Comparison

EGOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than GLBL.L's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
2.71%2.91%2.30%1.44%0.44%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGOG.L and GLBL.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLBL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLBL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EGOG.L.

EGOG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while GLBL.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EGOG.L and 0.10% for GLBL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGOG.L and GLBL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer