PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EGMW.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGMW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EGMW.L returned 11.70%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EGMW.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.

Performance

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EGMW.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGMW.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGMW.L achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.

EGMW.L

1D
0.11%
1M
5.23%
YTD
9.42%
6M
9.73%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
—

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EGMW.L
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		9.42%11.08%20.29%16.47%-11.09%24.85%13.66%0.99%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EGMW.L and CSP1.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019

0.95

The correlation between EGMW.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EGMW.L
CSP1.L

Technology

31.1%
38.0%

Financial Services

16.1%
11.3%

Industrials

10.0%
7.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.9%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.7%

Utilities

2.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Technology

EGMW.L
31.1%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Financial Services

EGMW.L
16.1%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Industrials

EGMW.L
10.0%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Healthcare

EGMW.L
9.1%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Communication Services

EGMW.L
8.9%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EGMW.L
8.8%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

EGMW.L
4.4%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Energy

EGMW.L
4.0%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

EGMW.L
3.0%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Utilities

EGMW.L
2.4%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Real Estate

EGMW.L
2.1%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Often compared with EGMW.L:
EGMW.L vs. V3AB.LEGMW.L vs. ^GSPCEGMW.L vs. VEVE.LEGMW.L vs. CSPX.LEGMW.L vs. SPYEGMW.L vs. IWDA.LEGMW.L vs. EGLN.L
Often compared with CSP1.L:
CSP1.L vs. CSPX.LCSP1.L vs. VUAG.LCSP1.L vs. SPYCSP1.L vs. IUSA.LCSP1.L vs. VUAA.LCSP1.L vs. SPY5.LCSP1.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EGMW.L
EGMW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EGMW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGMW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGMW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EGMW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGMW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EGMW.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EGMW.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.46
2.73

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.40
3.66

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

4.07

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

14.99

-0.76

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGMW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGMW.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EGMW.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.73

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.04

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.03

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.09

-0.31

Drawdowns

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGMW.L drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGMW.L and CSP1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EGMW.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-25.48%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-7.12%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-20.77%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-20.77%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.48%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.24%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-3.32%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.94%

-0.15%

Volatility

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EGMW.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EGMW.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.62%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

7.16%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

10.62%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.31%

14.31%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.57%

+0.48%

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGMW.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EGMW.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGMW.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.95, EGMW.L and CSP1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EGMW.L.

EGMW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. EGMW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EGMW.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGMW.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer