EGGY vs. XBTY
EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) and XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGY returned 29.29% vs -45.62% for XBTY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGGY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for XBTY.
Performance
EGGY vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGY achieves a 27.51% return, which is significantly higher than XBTY's -22.49% return.
EGGY
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- 6M
- 24.44%
- YTD
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBTY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -25.67%
- YTD
- -22.49%
- 1Y
- -45.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGY vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 27.51% | 15.90% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -22.49% | -21.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGY and XBTY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGY vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank
EGGY
XBTY
EGGY vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGGY | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.69 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | -0.93 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | -1.37 | +5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGGY vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGY drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum XBTY drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGY and XBTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGY | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -49.03% | +30.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -49.03% | +30.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.27% | -47.48% | +32.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -25.20% | +19.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 33.31% | -25.41% |
Volatility
EGGY vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 4.28%. This indicates that EGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGY | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.02% | 4.28% | +15.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.64% | 15.56% | +16.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.82% | 27.15% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 26.95% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 26.95% | +5.72% |
EGGY vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than XBTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGY vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison
EGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.67%, less than XBTY's 211.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 29.67% | 28.26% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 211.13% | 102.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGY and XBTY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGY has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to XBTY (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGY dropped -18.34% vs XBTY's -49.03%.
On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 29.29% vs -45.62% for XBTY. On fees, EGGY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 29.29% return vs -45.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.
XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 211.13%, compared with 29.67% for EGGY.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EGGY and 0.99% for XBTY.
EGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGY and XBTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer