EGGY vs. XBTY
EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) and XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGY returned 52.56% vs -39.34% for XBTY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGGY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for XBTY.
Performance
EGGY vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGY achieves a 41.66% return, which is significantly higher than XBTY's -21.52% return.
EGGY
- 1D
- -5.87%
- 1M
- 10.15%
- YTD
- 41.66%
- 6M
- 39.02%
- 1Y
- 52.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBTY
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -21.52%
- 6M
- -19.82%
- 1Y
- -39.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGY vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 41.66% | 15.90% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -21.52% | -21.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGY and XBTY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGY vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank
EGGY
XBTY
EGGY vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGGY | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.75 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | -0.84 | +3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | -1.26 | +8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGGY vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGY drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum XBTY drawdown of -47.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGY and XBTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGY | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -47.01% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -47.01% | +28.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -46.83% | +40.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -24.05% | +18.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 31.32% | -23.93% |
Volatility
EGGY vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 4.95%. This indicates that EGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGY | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.51% | 4.95% | +10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.05% | 15.69% | +11.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.15% | 27.60% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 27.41% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 27.41% | +3.00% |
EGGY vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than XBTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGY vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison
EGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.18%, less than XBTY's 226.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 25.18% | 28.26% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 226.15% | 102.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGY and XBTY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGY has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to XBTY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGY dropped -18.34% vs XBTY's -47.01%.
On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 52.56% vs -39.34% for XBTY. On fees, EGGY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 52.56% return vs -39.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.
XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 226.15%, compared with 25.18% for EGGY.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EGGY and 0.99% for XBTY.
EGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGY and XBTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer