EGGY vs. OMAH
EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGY returned 52.56% vs 11.47% for OMAH. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EGGY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGY achieves a 41.66% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.30% return.
EGGY
- 1D
- -5.87%
- 1M
- 10.15%
- YTD
- 41.66%
- 6M
- 39.02%
- 1Y
- 52.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 11.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 41.66% | 21.44% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 5.30% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGY and OMAH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | 0.17 |
The correlation between EGGY and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
EGGY
OMAH
EGGY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGGY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.84 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 9.13 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGGY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGY drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGY and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -11.83% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -3.00% | -15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -1.97% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -1.27% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 1.26% | +6.13% |
Volatility
EGGY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.21%. This indicates that EGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.51% | 2.21% | +13.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.05% | 5.58% | +21.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.15% | 8.04% | +24.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 13.03% | +17.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 13.03% | +17.38% |
EGGY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EGGY and OMAH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EGGY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
EGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.18%, more than OMAH's 14.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 25.18% | 28.26% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 14.05% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGY has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to OMAH (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGY dropped -18.34% vs OMAH's -11.83%.
On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 52.56% vs 11.47% for OMAH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 52.56% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGY and OMAH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EGGY has the higher dividend yield at 25.18%, compared with 14.05% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and VistaShares.
EGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGY and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer