EGGQ vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGQ returned 63.58% vs 6.12% for LQTI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGGQ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.42% return.

EGGQ

• 1D: 4.92%
• 1M: 17.67%
• YTD: 39.32%
• 6M: 38.36%
• 1Y: 63.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	39.32%	20.70%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.42%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGQ and LQTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

EGGQ vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGQ

EGGQ Risk / Return Rank: 57
EGGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EGGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EGGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EGGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EGGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 33
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EGGQ	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.21	+0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	1.76	+0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.21	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	1.72	+1.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.07	5.29	+3.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGQ and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGGQ	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	1.21	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	0.92	+0.54

Drawdowns

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGQ	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-3.41%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.76%	-3.41%	-16.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.18%	+1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-0.88%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.28%	1.10%	+6.18%

Volatility

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that EGGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGQ	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.50%	1.65%	+10.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.04%	4.04%	+21.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.24%	5.10%	+26.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.67%	5.97%	+26.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.67%	5.97%	+26.70%

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGQ vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than LQTI's 9.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	5.48%	5.70%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.09%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGQ and LQTI in my portfolio?

EGGQ and LQTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGGQ or LQTI?

EGGQ has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGQ dropped -22.70% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, EGGQ or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, EGGQ leads with 63.58% vs 6.12% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGQ or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, EGGQ has performed better with a 63.58% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGQ or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGQ or LQTI?

LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.09%, compared with 5.48% for EGGQ.

What is the main difference between EGGQ and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGQ and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.