EGAN vs. MAPS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about eGain Corporation (EGAN) and WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS).

Performance

EGAN vs. MAPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in eGain Corporation (EGAN) and WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EGAN vs. MAPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EGAN eGain Corporation	-24.39%	65.17%	-25.21%	-7.75%	-9.52%	-15.50%	49.12%	1.02%
MAPS WM Technology, Inc.	-17.74%	-40.21%	91.59%	-28.68%	-83.11%	-53.17%	28.86%	1.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EGAN : $220.56M MAPS : $73.89M
EPS EGAN : $1.29 MAPS : $0.02
PE Ratio EGAN : 6.01 MAPS : 37.58
PS Ratio EGAN : 2.39 MAPS : 0.42
PB Ratio EGAN : 2.48 MAPS : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) EGAN : $90.73M MAPS : $174.70M
Gross Profit (TTM) EGAN : $65.65M MAPS : $165.87M
EBITDA (TTM) EGAN : $9.86M MAPS : $19.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGAN achieves a -24.39% return, which is significantly lower than MAPS's -17.74% return.

EGAN

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -16.43%
• YTD: -24.39%
• 6M: -11.99%
• 1Y: 61.08%
• 3Y*: 0.83%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

MAPS

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: -17.74%
• 6M: -41.49%
• 1Y: -39.94%
• 3Y*: -7.20%
• 5Y*: -49.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EGAN vs. MAPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGAN

EGAN Risk / Return Rank: 67
EGAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EGAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EGAN Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EGAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EGAN Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MAPS

MAPS Risk / Return Rank: 15
MAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
MAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGAN vs. MAPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for eGain Corporation (EGAN) and WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EGAN	MAPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	-0.58	+1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	-0.62	+2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.93	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	-0.75	+1.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	-1.41	+4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGAN vs. MAPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the MAPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGAN and MAPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGAN	MAPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	-0.58	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	-0.55	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	-0.41	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between EGAN and MAPS is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EGAN vs. MAPS - Dividend Comparison

Neither EGAN nor MAPS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EGAN vs. MAPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGAN drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum MAPS drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGAN and MAPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGAN	MAPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.97%	-97.88%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.13%	-53.21%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.14%	-97.10%	+30.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.86%	-97.64%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-97.20%	-68.37%	-28.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.88%	28.33%	-5.45%

Volatility

EGAN vs. MAPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for eGain Corporation (EGAN) is 11.12%, while WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) has a volatility of 17.79%. This indicates that EGAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGAN	MAPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.12%	17.79%	-6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.42%	42.38%	+9.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.12%	69.52%	-2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.50%	90.36%	-36.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.43%	83.24%	-19.81%

Financials

EGAN vs. MAPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between eGain Corporation and WM Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EGAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, eGain Corporation reported a gross profit of 16.81M and revenue of 22.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.

MAPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WM Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.88M and revenue of 43.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.9%.

EGAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, eGain Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05M and revenue of 22.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.9%.

MAPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WM Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.81M and revenue of 43.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.5%.

EGAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, eGain Corporation reported a net income of 2.34M and revenue of 22.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

MAPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WM Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -3.57M and revenue of 43.07M, resulting in a net margin of -8.3%.