PortfoliosLab logo
MAPS vs. WAB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MAPS and WAB is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MAPS vs. WAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAPS:

-0.08

WAB:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

MAPS:

0.46

WAB:

0.99

Omega Ratio

MAPS:

1.05

WAB:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

MAPS:

-0.04

WAB:

0.75

Martin Ratio

MAPS:

-0.20

WAB:

2.25

Ulcer Index

MAPS:

21.07%

WAB:

7.83%

Daily Std Dev

MAPS:

71.33%

WAB:

27.85%

Max Drawdown

MAPS:

-97.85%

WAB:

-71.84%

Current Drawdown

MAPS:

-96.10%

WAB:

-8.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAPS:

$189.34M

WAB:

$32.96B

EPS

MAPS:

$0.08

WAB:

$6.39

PE Ratio

MAPS:

14.00

WAB:

30.14

PS Ratio

MAPS:

1.03

WAB:

3.14

PB Ratio

MAPS:

3.29

WAB:

3.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAPS:

$140.13M

WAB:

$10.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAPS:

$133.41M

WAB:

$3.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAPS:

$23.91M

WAB:

$2.02B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPS achieves a -18.84% return, which is significantly lower than WAB's 1.73% return.


MAPS

YTD

-18.84%

1M

5.66%

6M

47.74%

1Y

-1.75%

5Y*

-35.40%

10Y*

N/A

WAB

YTD

1.73%

1M

14.20%

6M

-3.80%

1Y

14.97%

5Y*

29.49%

10Y*

7.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAPS vs. WAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAPS is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAPS is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAPS is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAPS is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAPS is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAPS is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

WAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAB is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAB is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAB is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAB is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAB is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAB is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAPS vs. WAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MAPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the WAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPS and WAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MAPS vs. WAB - Dividend Comparison

MAPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MAPS
WM Technology, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
0.44%0.42%0.54%0.60%0.52%0.66%0.62%0.68%0.54%0.43%0.39%0.23%

Drawdowns

MAPS vs. WAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPS drawdown since its inception was -97.85%, which is greater than WAB's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPS and WAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MAPS vs. WAB - Volatility Comparison

WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) has a higher volatility of 14.15% compared to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) at 9.22%. This indicates that MAPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MAPS vs. WAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WM Technology, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
47.67M
2.61B
(MAPS) Total Revenue
(WAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAPS vs. WAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WM Technology, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
95.2%
34.5%
(MAPS) Gross Margin
(WAB) Gross Margin
MAPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, WM Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.38M and revenue of 47.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.2%.

WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 900.00M and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

MAPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, WM Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.55M and revenue of 47.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 474.00M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

MAPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, WM Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 2.35M and revenue of 47.67M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 322.00M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.